Abstract:
The central experiment
described in our paper Equidistant Letter Sequences in the Book of
Genesis[1] was carried out using the second list of Rabbis.
In order to replicate this experiment we have prepared two new lists of
appellations for those same personalities, based on a suggestion made
by one of our critics. Measurement of the convergences between the names
and dates was carried out in the same manner as in [1]. Significance was
measured and found to be high for one of the lists:
p= 0.000042.
In light of this measurement,
two new lists of names were prepared for the personalities in the first
list in [1], using the same method. Significance was measured, and for
one of the lists it came to: p = 0.0344.
Introduction:
Our paper, Equidistant
Letter Sequences in the Book of Genesis[1], published in Statistical
Science, dealt with the relationship between the names of famous rabbinical
personalities and their dates of birth and death, appearing as Equidistant
Letter Sequences (ELS's) in the book of Genesis. The primary experiment
discussed in the paper, the permutation test, was performed on the second
list of rabbis. The name/date convergences showed a high level of significance:
p = 0.000016.
Several critics [2]
tried to explain away the experiment's successful results by suggesting
that the list of names and appellations had been artificially optimized.
According to the critics, the weak point in the experiment was the need
to resort to the judgement of a bibliographical consultant. This left
room for the investigators to conspire with consultant to compile an optimized
list. We will not deal with this allegation here. In our opinion, we have
already completely refuted this accusation elsewhere [3]. Nevertheless,
a successful replication would clearly increase confidence in the original
experiment.
In the present work
an experiment was conducted using a new list of appellations for the same
personalities. The compilation of this list conformed entirely to the
existing guidelines, and there was no need for further decision making
on the part of a consultant.
The second list [4]
(which was prepared by an expert in rabbinical bibliography, Prof. S.
Z. Havlin) included names and appellations of the following types:
"Rabbi So-and-so".
Surnames.
Full names.
Common designations.
Designations of authors based on the titles of their works.
Mathematician Prof.
Alex Lubotsky, noted in a critical article [5] that there was another
type of designation that could have been used that is, the patronymic.
Lubotsky [6] says that the patronymic is introduced by the word ןב
"son of," or with the abbreviation B "R, which "The
New Dictionary" [7] expands to
יבר ןב "son of Rabbi." [we use the Michigan-Clairmont scheme for transliterating Hebrew letters].
According to Lubotsky's suggestion, if the father's name was
ינולפ (So-and-so), the son should be referred to by the designation ןב
ינולפ (son of So-and-so) or ינולפ יבר ןב (son of Rabbi So-and-so).
I compiled two new lists
of appellations for the personalities of the second list: one list comprised
of names of the form ינולפ ןב , and another list with the form ינולפ יבר ןב .
These lists were then used as the basis for evaluating name/date convergences
following precisely the same procedure as in [1]. To round out the investigation
I did another experiment: I compiled two more lists parallel to these
for the personalities of the first list, and measured their convergences
in the same way. The first part of this article will describe the experiment
conducted for the personalities of the second list. The second
part will describe the experiment for the personalities of the first
list.
: To obtain the relevant data for
the patronymics I used the Encyclopedia of Great Men in Israel[8], which was the source used as a basis for the compilation of the original
lists [1]. I checked the entries of the personalities of the second list.
If the name of the personality's father was given in the entry
I would take it.
:
a) If the father had a single name, ינולפ , for example, we write:
ינולפ ןב .
b) If the father had a double name,ינומלא ינולפ (there were 3 such
cases) we will use Havlin's rule, specified in paragraph 4 of his Report
[9]. According to this rule (which was used in the composition of both
original lists):
If the father's double name consists of two Hebrew first names,
such as ןושמש השמ ("Moshe Shimshon"), we treat the double name
as a single unit. Thus we write: ןושמש השמ ןב .
If, however, the second private name derives from another language,
as in the name רעב בד ("Dov Ber"), for example, we take רעב
("Ber", which means "Dov" in Yiddish) as a nickname,
and treat them as alternates, indicating the son both as בד ןב , as well
as רעב ןב .
Spelling: For conventions in spelling I used the
exact same rules as in [1].
II. The "ben"-type sample:
The sample consists
of pairs of expressions. In each pair one expression is the name of the
personality, while the other is his date of birth or death. The dates
were copied from [1]. Table A1 lists the data for the various names
and forms of the date.
: The convergences were
measured exactly as described in [1]. 52 values of c(w,w') were
obtained. The values of P1 and P2 were calculated
and found to be:
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'1, P1
ranked 21. That is, r1 = 2.1 X 10-5.
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'2, P2
ranked 212. That is, r2 = 2.12 X 10-4.
The overall significance came to r = 2 X r1 = 4.20
X 10-5.
IV. Collecting the data for the "ben Rabbi" ( יבר ןב )
list:
The data was obtained
and the forms were determined exactly as described above in section I
for the "ben" list, except that in this case, obviously, the
form is "ben Rabbi So-and-so" rather than "ben So-and-so."
V. The "ben Rabbi"-type sample:
The sample consists of pairs of expressions. In each pair one expression
is the name of the personality, while the other is his date of birth or
death. The dates were copied from [1]. Table A2 lists the data
for the various names and forms of the date.
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'1, P1
ranked 563,863. That is, r1 = 5.64 X 10-1.
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'2, P2
ranked 705,281. That is, r2 = 7.05 X 10-1.
The overall significance came to r = 2 X r1 > 1.
In other words, it was not significant.
The data
was obtained and the forms determined in exactly the same manner as for
the second list. Therefore we will present straight away the samples and
their results.
I. The "ben"-type sample: The sample consists
of pairs of expressions. In each pair one expression is the name of the
personality, while the other is his date of birth or death. The dates
were copied from [1]. Table B1 lists the data for the various names
and forms of the date.
: All the measurements were
made as above. 77 values of c(w,w') were obtained. The values of
P1 and P2 were calculated and found to be:
P1 = 5.91 X 10-1
P2 = 6.30 X 10-1
The results of the permutation test
:
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'1, P1
ranked 771,853. That is, r1 = 7.72 X 10-1.
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'2, P2
ranked 806,056. That is, r2 = 8.06 X 10-1.
The overall significance came to r = 2 X r1 > 1.
In other words, it was not significant.
III. The "ben Rabbi"-type sample:
The sample consists
of pairs of expressions. In each pair one expression is the name of the
personality, while the other is his date of birth or death. The dates
were copied from [1]. Table B2 lists the data for the various names
and forms of the date.
: All the measurements were
made as above. In this case only 5 non-zero values of c(w,w') exist.
The values of P1 and P2 were calculated and found
to be:
P1 = 5.79 X 10-2
P2 =5.90 X 10-2
The results of the permutation test
:
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'1, P1
ranked 25,567. That is, r1 = 2.56 X 10-2.
Out of 1,000,000 values of P'2, P2
ranked 17,236. That is, r2 = 1.72X 10-2.
The overall significance came to r = 2 X r1 = 3.44
X 10-2.
Acknowledgements:
I would like to thank
Yoav Rosenberg and Yaakov Rosenberg for preparing the programs used in
making these measurements.
2. M. Bar Hillel, D. Bar Natan, B. McKay; One Can Skip in War and Peace
Too, Galileo [Magazine], No. 25 ('98), pp. 52-57.
3. D. Witztum, The Additional Dimension: TheRefutation
of the Criticismsconcerning the List of Famous Rabbis, [in
Hebrew], March '98. The articles and documents included in this publication
can be found (also in English) here .
Abstract: D. Witztum, A Refutation Refuted, Galileo, No. 26 ('98),
pp. 75-76.
4. The second list of names and appellations prepared by Prof. Havlin
for use in the original experiment was published in full in a preprint
of [1] in the winter of '88.
5. A. Lubotsky, Unraveling the Code [חנעפ תנפצ], Ha'aretz,
Sept. 3 '97.
6. Prof. Lubotsky gave two examples of patronymics for the Vilna Gaon
(number 5 on the first list), whose father's name was ןמלז המלש ("
Shelomo Zalman"). The forms he chose were: ןמלז המלש ןב ןמלז המלש ר"ב .
7. A. Even Shushan, Hamilon Hachadash (The New Dictionary),
Kiryat Sefer, Jerusalem, '89, "Acronyms and Abbreviations",
p. 1624.
8. M. Margalioth (editor), Encyclopedia of Great Men in Israel,
Joshua Chachik Publishing House, Tel Aviv, '61.